Resume "POW" factors: Developers

By Robin Dube on February 25, 2008 - Comments (View)
Does your resume say you're the hero...or a sidekick? Red Canary asks recruiters and managers what a great resume looks like

This is the first installment in a continuing series that asks hiring managers and recruiters to share their criteria for putting a resume in the ‘superstar’ category.

Most technology professionals know how to execute resume essentials: Keep it tidy, run a spell check, put accomplishments in front of skills, and so on.
I want to see developers who are living and breathing their languages and skills, on the job, to solve problems, not just reading about Java in a book one day

But what do recruiters and hiring managers really look for? What jumps off a page and says that the person in front of them isn’t merely competent, but a must-call? In short, what are the POW factors of a great resume?

To find out, Red Canary asked Greg Veres, Director of Development with Blue Coat Systems and Penny Curtis, a recruiter with the Laudi Group who specializes in R&D placements. Both of them agreed on some very specific points.

If you’ve built it, they will call
Curtis, who recruits R&D professionals for employers as diverse as Research in Motion and Points.com, loves to see three little words: “developed flagship product”. Contributing to a company’s core product is the resume equivalent of a gold star, particularly if the developer is able to describe how they impacted the company’s bottom line.

Working on cutting-edge projects is also an indicator of ability and trustworthiness. According to Curtis, a great resume is one that conveys, “When the hard projects come in, I’m who they turn to”.

For Veres, staying power is key: “I look for people who have been through the full development cycle of a project. I want people who have lived through shipping a product and have had to deal with the bugs that come back in from the field.”

It’s not what you know, it’s who you’ve worked for
Where you’ve worked makes a difference. “Certain companies have a good reputation,” says Curtis. “I’ll always look at those resumes.” Recruiters know which companies consistently produce superpower developers, and which ones produce cheesy sidekicks. And bigger doesn’t mean better. “In a medium-sized company, a developer is exposed to so much more—the good, the bad, and the ugly,” says Curtis.

Smart developers don’t stop . . . developing
A scintillating CV shows progression in project complexity and responsibility—and parallel development of skills and languages. According to Curtis, developer resumes can get rusty quickly. “New technologies stand out,” says Curtis. “Do they have a keen interest in independent projects, including contributing to Open Source projects?” Continuous learning counts. “I look for developers who’ve taken coursework after finishing school,” says Curtis.

Fluent in Java? Great. But do you speak customer?
Recruiters love resumes that show customer-facing responsibilities. Why? Because it demonstrates ‘soft’ skills and an understanding of the bigger picture. “If an employer put them in front of customers, I know that they can break things down to people who might not be technical”, says Curtis. Coding with the customer in mind is an invaluable asset—especially for a young technology company.

Great devs are object(ive) oriented
As Blue Coat’s Director of Development, Greg Veres has seen thousands of resumes. He says, “I want to see developers who are living and breathing their languages and skills, on the job, to solve problems, not just reading about Java in a book one day.”

Both Veres and Curtis dismiss ‘grocery list’ resumes that rattle off every tool or language the person has ever read about or overheard in the lunch room. “No one can be be an expert in everything” says Curtis.

Resume dampeners
• Switching from industry to industry
• Jumping from job to job
• Sliding from development to management and back
• Grocery lists of skills or tools
• Lack of career growth

Other Pow Factors
• Mix of coding and design involvment
• Good job tenures
• Complexity of work
• Can fit job into company’s bigger picture

Comments

Trevor Stafford Vote-kill Vote-no Vote-yes Trevor Stafford
feb 25 2008 15:41
10 Reputation Points

You may be saying “what does it matter if recruiters like my resume, I’ve never had trouble finding a job”.

If all you’re looking for is a job, then that’s fine. But if you’re looking to work on the most challenging projects and with the best people, as if often the case with growing technology companies, then knowing what the experts look for can get you those ‘dream’ job offers. Oh and the money that comes with them ain’t bad either.

  Edit (for another )
Saravana Rajan Vote-kill Vote-no Vote-yes Saravana Rajan
mar 12 2008 11:15
3 Reputation Points

Great observations by both Greg Veres and Penny Curtis. Though I have a different view on couple of dampeners.

1. Switching from industry to industry – I personally see that as a POW factors, as the developer from other industries can bring in fresh perspectives, designs or “out of the box” thinking.

Also, how many companies do we have in the same industry in Canada / Ontario / Waterloo Region. It may be unreasonable to expect people to stay within their own industry as well.

2. Sliding from development to management and back – hey the developer has already tried to be in management and realized that its not for them. For me all experiences are good as long as the person can show the ability to learn from the experience and avoid repeating the same mistakes in future.

  Edit (for another )
Penny Curtis Vote-kill Vote-no Vote-yes Penny Curtis
mar 14 2008 14:47
8 Reputation Points

Hi Saravana,

Thanks for your feedback on the article. You raised two very good points. Regarding industry shifts, you’re exactly right when saying it can bring fresh ideas to a workplace. But to add some backgrounder – I mean if someone completely changes his or her path several times. It can send a red flag to recruiters forcing us to think “why such a huge change in every new job?” It makes me wonder if people are unsure of their career path or is simply changing for a new challenge (which isn’t a bad thing).

About sliding from development to management – and back again. It is by no means a bad thing if you try it and find out it’s not for you. It happens to a lot of people. If you keep moving between each of them it’s similar to my thoughts on industry shifting. It becomes hard to be an expert in one area if you’re moving back and forth. Plus, I’ve had clients ask, “which position would they be more committed to?”

Your resume shouldn’t be the sole deciding factor on being hired. In an interview some resume red flags may end up being less of a concern if you are able to explain your choices.

  Edit (for another )
blog comments powered by Disqus