Tech sales: compensate to motivate

By Lee Salz on July 15, 2008 - Comments (View)
In a nutshell

• Sales people do what makes them money, so sales compensation plans should align with company goals
• Plans should motivate on daily basis
• Long sales cycles require special attention
• The Sales Behaviorial Objective aligns action with results over time
• Starts with assimilation quarter, then bonus/points system
One of the most common complaints I hear from executives is that their sales team is not doing the things they feel are most critical to the success of the company.

I then ask to see their compensation plan.

After a thorough read, I share my impression of what their plan motivates their salespeople to do—and ask if this is their intention.

They usually look at me blankly and say, “No, our intention is for our sales people to…” And thus the disconnect is exposed.

Sales people invest their time on activities that drive their compensation. Plain and simple.
As one executive shared after going through the exercise,

“We want our sales people to focus on selling our new product to our existing clients. Yet, we are compensating the sales people in a way that they are better off pursuing new clients.”

He got it!

The incongruence of sales compensation is one of the biggest disconnects in companies. Executives sit in a board room with strategic plans of grandeur, but the plan collapses when they don’t address the compensation for the sales troops.

It is a very simple equation. Sales people invest their time on activities that drive their compensation. Plain and simple. The thought that sales people will actively and consistently perform activities that are not in their best financial interests is naïve.

When structuring sales compensation plans, a company should strongly consider the goals for the company.

Working backwards, the goals for the company drive the structure of the sales compensation plan.

Further complicating matters, there are instances where sales people are compensated for delivering certain results while their managers are compensated on a different set of results.

Thus, the sales managers are driving their team consistently with their compensation message, but inconsistently with their sales team members.

It creates the visual of the sales manager pushing a boulder up a hill trying to get their team to focus on activities that contradict their income. Best of luck!

When structuring sales compensation plans, a company should strongly consider the goals for the company. Working backwards, the goals for the company drive the structure of the sales compensation plan. Thus, they should be directly aligned.

If the company’s goal is to gain adoption of a new product in the marketplace, the plan should reward sales people for accomplishing this feat.

If the goal is to increase revenue with their current clientele, the plan should reward for that. Anyone should be able to read the plan and derive the intended message.

The second consideration, when structuring sales compensation plans, is that sales managers and sales people should have alignment with their respective results. If one is compensated for adding new clients and the other for selling a new product to existing clients, and it does matter which is compensated for which, the incongruence causes a paralysis of performance.

Making this more daunting is that in complex sales environments, those that have protracted buying cycles, the standard salary and commission model does not create enough of a framework to ensure that the sales team performs the right activities every day.

How do you structure the plan so that the team is motivated to do the right things every hour of every day?

Bridging the long cycle gap
Employers also face a challenge of hiring sales people who are concerned about the length of time of the buying cycle in contrast to their earnings. The standard solution is to bridge the gap with a draw.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the big buzz term was MBO (Management by Objective). What if you created a Sales Behavioral Objective?
As you probably know, there are two types of draws. There is the recoverable draw which is, in essence, a loan against the sales person’s future commissions.

Then, there is the other, the non-recoverable draw which is money, free and clear, to the sales person for some period of time. Nothing good comes out of either of these. The recoverable draw, almost always, puts the sales person in a financial hole.

They wake up each morning knowing they owe the company money. No one enjoys the feeling of debt. The non-recoverable draw, often times, creates an earnings cliff. Let’s say that the draw is for three months at $2,000 per month. In month four, the sales person probably experiences a significant fall-off in their earnings. The end result is relationship damage between the sales person and the company and a poor corporate investment.

How do you structure the sales compensation plan to bridge the earnings gap when recruiting new sales people?

A Creative Approach to Compensation
The challenge of motivating sales people and bridging the sales earnings gap can be solved with a creative compensation approach. In the 1980s and 1990s, the big buzz term was MBO (Management by Objective).

Business people were provided with a series of objectives, and, following a performance review, were compensated for achievement of such.

What if the MBO concept was applied to sales compensation? What if you created a Sales Behavioral Objective or SBO?

If you are reading this and think that I’ve just created additional sales cost, think again. I’m proposing a reallocation of the dollars paid to your sales team. A percentage of the dollars normally budgeted for commissions would be allocated for an SBO bonus.

Consider this. A company has a typical buying process with its clientele that is six months long. They pay their sales people a base salary of $60,000. At 100% of plan, the sales person earns $90,000 or $30,000 over their base salary. However, no commissions are earned in their first six months of employment due to the buying cycle.

The company, as a means of managing sales behaviors and attracting strong sales talent, budgets $15,000 of the $30,000 of commissions for the SBO bonus. The sales person is then eligible to earn a $3,500 bonus each quarter in year one.

At the beginning of each quarter, the sales person has a formal review where the results of the prior quarter are shared and the mission for the second is presented. The SBO changes from quarter to quarter based on the tenure of the sales person and the needs of the business. The SBO is also not a “gimme.” 100% accomplishment should be a stretch goal, but achievable for the sales person.

A Sales Behaviorial Objective walk-through
In the first quarter, the overall mission is getting the sales person assimilated into the company’s environment. The measurements of success at the end of the quarter are: a business/territory plan, the ability for the sales person to call on prospects, and knowledge of the products.
Results are a function of doing the right things each and every day

As measurement of achievement, the company provides a written test on product knowledge, a scored, mock sales call, a scored, mock, sales presentation, and review of their business/territory plan. Based on the sales person’s accomplishments, they will receive a percentage of the $3,500 up to 100%.

In future quarters, a points system is put in place, making the SBO entirely objective, tied to performing the activities deemed critical for the success of the business. In each quarter, the goal is for the sales person to achieve 100 points. The main objective in the second quarter for this company is to have face-to-face meetings with qualified prospects.

They are looking for their sales person to have twenty face-to-face meetings in the quarter as a way to jump start their sales pipeline. Thus, the SBO compensates five points for each meeting held. At the end of the quarter, whatever percentage the sales person delivers of the 100 points, with a minimum achievement of 75%, is paid as a bonus.

This includes those who overperform. Why penalize them for doing more of the right things? What about quality? How do you know they are doing the right things in the prospect meeting? Hopefully, you measured their proficiency in doing those things in the first quarter.

The SBO program, in future quarters, is designed by identifying key, measurable sales activities aligned with the needs of the business. Place weighting on the activities commensurate with your expectations of the sales person.
The Benefits of the SBO Plan

Some of you are probably thinking, “No way, I pay for results!” Well, results are a function of doing the right things each and every day. Results are not miraculous. They are formulaic. The reality is that you have skin in the game with the SBO. As a business executive, you and your team are tasked with determining what it takes for a sales person to generate the results you desire.

If you have done your job of identifying the success metrics and the sales person achieves those, the results take care of themselves. The SBO is not just for year one since the challenge of managing sales behaviors is perpetual. One important key is to budget enough dollars for the SBO bonus that it gets the attention of the sales people, but not so high that it overshadows commissions.

The bottom line is that the SBO program gives you the tool kit to channel the energy of the sales team toward achieving that goal. It also provides you with a mechanism to attract sales talent to your company where, right on day one, they need to perform to earn dollars over their salary.

One other benefit of this program for those companies with lengthy buying processes, the SBO provides you with a way to assess the sales person’s performance in a way that you can identify, more quickly, those who will not be successful in your company.

One thing is for sure, the executive team of the company in the story knows that if they paid a sales person $15,000 SBO bonus in year one, year two and beyond are going to be stellar.


Lee B. Salz is the CEO of Business Expert Webinars, President of Sales Dodo, and author of “Soar Despite Your Dodo Sales Manager.” Known as “The Sales Dodo,” Lee specializes in helping companies and their sales organizations adapt and thrive in the ever-changing world of business. He is an online columnist for Sales and Marketing Management Magazine and the host of the Internet radio show, “Secrets of Business Gurus.” Look for Lee’s new book in 2009 titled, “The Sales Marriage… How to Hire the Right Sales People.” He is a passionate, dynamic speaker and a business consultant. Lee can be reached via email at lsalz@salesdodo.com, or by phone at 763.416.4321.

Comments

Melanie Baker Vote-kill Vote-no Vote-yes Melanie Baker
jul 16 2008 11:19
2 Reputation Points

Back in my early corporate career, an SVP of mine summed it up in the phrase “coin operated”. To this day I haven’t heard a better overall explanation to explain sales folks (especially in tech) and how to work with/motivate them. :)

  Edit (for another )
Norman Nicol Vote-kill Vote-no Vote-yes Norman Nicol
jul 24 2008 11:20
1 Reputation Point

How do you tell your sales staff that the first 6 months commissions go into a pot? Traditionally new sales staff tend to peak the first 6 months then decline in their sales efforts. Someone who has worked hard for 6 months and sees their commission get spreaded around may not be there for the next 6 months. I see your plan maybe working in the sales staff second year. Best way to pay an employee is to have pay salary plus commission.

  Edit (for another )
Gail C Vote-kill Vote-no Vote-yes Gail C
jul 26 2008 16:09
5 Reputation Points

Love the early remarks highlighting the mis-alignment of rewards and objectives in many settings. If everyone isn’t on the same page working towards common goals, it’s going to be tough haul to get there.

I totally agree with cultivating your folks through a reasonable period of integration. The first 90-days are the golden opportunity to groom success – yes, results are a function of doing the right things each and every day.

However, one of the basic tenets of motivation is clarity. Surely the key success indicators at the end of Q1 are simply great product knowledge, and number of appointments booked – which are easily measurable. Strikes me that the metrics beyond that are open to subjectivity which is not within the sales person’s control.

Mock calls and presentations are great developmental/coaching tools rather than being linked to a compensation element. How many times have you seen a successful salesperson’s approach/delivery that you didn’t particularly like or agree with? At the end of the day, it’s the customer who is going to decide what works for them.

If you know it’s typically going to be a 9-month sales cycle, don’t penalize you new star performers if they don’t deliver in the first 6-months – or demoralize them by not compensating them as agreed if they do.

Consider a flat non-recoverable draw during the integration period. To avoid the ‘earnings cliff’ – think about a sliding non-recoverable draw aligned with your typical sales cycle off-set with a recoverable draw. Instead of just bonusing face-to-face meetings in Q2 etc. – weight in a closing percentage ratio – both of which are squarely in the salesperson’s own ball court. Really not convoluted, easily measurable, and keeps folks focused and motivated – and they’ll want to stay!

  Edit (for another )
blog comments powered by Disqus